dynamic interaction ? dynamic criticality ?

BEHOLD ! FOR HISTORY WILL BE OUR JUDGE . . .

DYNAMIC INTERACTION ? CHAOTIC CRITICALITY ?
01 02 2007

WE HAVE OFTEN HAD THE HONOUR TO EXPLAIN TO OUR PLANETARY AUDIENCES THAT
MANY HUMANS SUFFER FROM CONFLICTING LOYALTIES (for example global mind address United Nations 2002 # global mind address President Bush) RESULTING IN IMPOSSIBLE ODDS BETWEEN WHICH WE MUST CHOOSE.

THE GLOBAL MIND STAFF SOMETIMES HAS THE SAME PROBLEM WHICH NATURALLY HAS SOMETIMES RESULTED IN THREATS FROM VARIOUS SOURCES .

WHEN TENSIONS MOUNT AT A PLANETARY LEVEL THIS OFTEN LEADS TO NEGATIVE DYNAMIC INTERACTION USUALLY EXTENDING TO SMALLER SYSTEMS (LIKE FAMILIES) AS WELL .

THIS MAY ULTIMATELY CREATE CHAOTIC STATES APPROACHING CHAOTIC CRITICALITY .

MORE
IN ORDER TO SERVE YOU BEST WE WILL ILLUSTRATE THIS WITH OUR COMPLIANCE WITH CULTURAL DIFFUSION WITH AN EXAMPLE (LINE) WE HAVE NEVER USED BEFORE .
WE ARE REFERRING TO THE FOLLOWING LINE :

WE HOLD EVERYONE LIABLE FOR CAUSED DAMAGES BY THEM AND WE WILL DEMAND FULL COMPENSATION IF FOR WHATEVER REASON (RELEVANT) PROSECUTORS CAUSE (SUCH) DAMAGES.

MOST RELEVANT LINKS :

GLOBAL MIND

PLANETARY SYSTEM

META SYSTEM TRANSITION PERIOD

CHAOTIC CRITICALITY

CHAOTIC CRITICALITY :
CHAOTIC CRITICALITY EXISTS WHEN A MAXIMAL NUMBER OF CONDITIONS IS REACHED WHERE EVEN A MINIMAL EVENT WILL CAUSE TOTAL SYSTEM COLLAPSE .

DYNAMIC INTERACTION

WITH DYNAMIC INTERACTION WE MEAN THE PHENOMENON THAT RELEVANT SYSTEMS CONTINUOUSLY INFLUENCE EACH OTHER IN TIME WHICH MAY OR MAY NOT CHANCE THE SYSTEMS PROPERTIES AND THE PROPERTIES OF SUBSEQUENT RELEVANT SYSTEMS .

THIS PHENOMENON APPLIES TO BOTH ORGANIC AND INORGANIC SYSTEMS OF BOTH MICRO- AND MACROCOSMIC ORDER .

FOR EXAMPLE A CHEMICAL (MOLECULE) COULD KILL A BACTERIA WHICH COULD OTHERWISE HAVE INCAPACITATED A HUMAN WHO COULD HAVE CHANGED THE WORLD.

THE (MICROCOSMIC/INORGANIC) MOLECULE COULD NOT HAVE CHANGED THE (MACROCOSMIC/ORGANIC AND INORGANIC) WORLD DIRECTLY .

ONLY BY INTERFACING WITH THE (MICROCOSMIC/ORGANIC BACTERIA) AND THE (ORGANIC) HUMAN COULD THIS DYNAMIC INTERACTION TAKE PLACE.

RELEVANT SYSTEMS WE CONSIDER SYSTEMS THAT CAN DIRECTLY INFLUENCE EACH OTHER (e.g. THE MOLECULE AND THE BACTERIA IN THE EXAMPLE ABOVE).

NEGATIVE DYNAMIC INTERACTION .

RESULTING IN DETERIORATION OF THE RELEVANT SYSTEM’’S SIGNIFICANT QUALITIES .

SINCE THE NEGATIVE INTERACTION IS DYNAMIC THE DETERIORATED SYSTEMS WILL SUBSEQUENTLY CONTINUE TO INTERACT IN A DETERIORATED MODE WITH OTHER ACCESSIBLE SYSTEMS (WHICH MAY ALSO HAVE PROGRESSIVELY DETERIORATED) .

THUS VICIOUS CIRCLES EMERGE OF MORE AND MORE INCREASINGLY DETERIORATING SYSTEMS INTERACTING WITH OTHER MORE AND MORE DETERIORATING SYSTEMS.

WHEN NEGATIVE DYNAMIC INTERACTION IS NOT INTERRUPTED IT ULTIMATELY RESULTS IN THE TOTAL DESTRUCTION OF THE RELEVANT SYSTEMS.

VISCOUS DYNAMIC INTERACTION .

BETWEEN SYSTEMS WITH ONE SYSTEM INTERACTING ULTIMATELY AT THE MORTAL COST OF THE OTHER SYSTEM e.g. AS IN BUBONIC PLAGUE.

COPYRIGHT PROTECTED © STICHTING THE UNICORN FOUNDATION 2007
© J. P. KROL & J A SANYOUR (WWW.GLOBALMIND.INFO) STICHTING THE UNICORN FOUNDATION

BACK

HOME

EUROPEAN CONSTITUTION CRISIS - PRELIMINARY GLOBAL MIND COMMENT

EUROPEAN CONSTITUTION CRISIS IN GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE : POLITICAL DEVELOPMENTS
AFTER 20 SEPTEMBER 2005

EUROPEAN CONSTITUTION CRISIS IN GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE : POLITICAL ASPECTS DEVELOPING
AFTER 23 OCTOBER 2005

EUROPEAN CONSTITUTION CRISIS IN GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE : POLITICAL ASPECTS DEVELOPING
AFTER 01 NOVEMBER 2005

DOUCE FRANCE , PAYS DE MON ENFANCE
NOVEMBER 2005